Date, time and venue: October 11 at 11:00 (Kyiv time) at the Ukrainian Crisis Media Center. The topics for discussion:
Who will be the leader of a united Europe after Mrs. Merkel?
France’s finest hour?
Germany after Angela Merkel: policy towards Russia and the future of North Stream-2;
Will relations between Ukraine and the EU change after German parliamentary elections?
A roundtable discussion entitled “Nord Stream 2: reality check, is there life after death?” framed by the NGO “Euro-Atlantic Course” was held in Kyiv. Attempts to reinstate a dialogue with the Russian Federation in a new form including Nord Stream 2, partly owe to the fact that Ukraine’s position was blurred, it stopped being clear and grounded in values, said Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, MP, chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Integration of Ukraine with the EU, discussion moderator. “We have lost a moral advantage we used to have from 2014,” she underscored. Ukraine needs a real strategy to confront the likely completion and going into operation of Nord Stream 2, a strategy that would include security, economic, and technical components, Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze said. “So far, we do not have such a step-by-step strategy. Ukraine should not accept any economic compensations. That is a matter of our survival. If there is something to discuss, those are concrete security issues,” Klympush-Tsintsadze said. Ukraine’s arguments will be better heard if Ukraine proceeds with actual reforms, she added. In order to convince the U.S. and Germany, Ukraine needs to reinvigorate the reforms in the energy sector, emphasized Matthew Bryza, Former US Ambassador, Senior Research Fellow at the Atlantic Council Center for Global Energy, Eurasia and Turkey. Ukraine needs to put the efforts to be in the spotlight of opinion leaders in Washington, as the construction of Nord Stream 2 in times when Putin occupied Crimea and Donbas is unacceptable. “It’s a horrible political signal,” Bryza emphasized. The major threat of the pipeline completion is a security threat, said Valeriy Chaly, former Ambassador of Ukraine to the United States. “We have to emphasize it. Discussing economic or financial compensations is inappropriate. We have to work out a unified position that cannot begin with the word ‘compensation’. The key position is security, not economy,” said Chaly. “To address the security deficit on the NATO’s eastern flank, very quick decisions need to be made, for example, to provide assistance to Ukraine including sending lethal weapons,” he added. Andriy Kobolev, former chairman of the board at NJSC “Naftogaz of Ukraine” warned against the discussions on loading the Ukrainian gas pipeline system with the transit from Central Asia. “Even if the pressure on Russia turns successful now, Putin can quickly stop it. In the Russian Federation, there are no independent companies. The Kremlin is in control of everything. We need to fight so that the pipeline is not completed and put in operation. Compensations are to be demanded from the West. Russian guarantees are not...
Можна вічно слухати як тече вода, дивитись як палає вогонь та писати про порушення інтелектуальних прав в Україні. Підписавши Угоду про асоціацію з ЄС, український уряд зобов’язався уніфікувати та гармонізувати наше законодавство в непростій царині інтелектуальної власності.